Dear Nejc, > as far as I can understand your draft, you make NAPT44 in the CE obligatory.
[Gang] Yes. This is to avoid the problem where there are applications that attempt to bind to specific ports that are not part of the allowed port range. > However, this is not the case for 4rd, dIVI, SA46T-AS and Lightweight > 4over6 A+P drafts. [Gang] I guess this is always the case for port constrained mechanisms. >So I suggest that you make it optional in 4via6 translation as > well, since it might > be desired for some environments to connect hosts supporting 4via6 > translation > technology, directly to the IPv6 network. In this case, you don't need > the translator. [Gang] Could you help to elaborate the environment ? Many thanks Gang _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
