Dear Behcet,
Of course. But you could support various scenarios in the scope of your draft,
not only the common "CPE" one.
No.
a+p does not require a NAT44 to be used. This is the case here (my guess)
because NAT44 is commonly used in the current CE routers and they don't wish to
waste public IPv4 addresses.
Also NAT44 usage has nothing to do with the port range restrictions of the CE.
It is normal behavior of NAPT to select a different source port for the
outgoing packet and the port range restriction comes into use here,
CE has to use a source port from its range.
Sorry, but I didn't get your point. So you think that it is okay as it
is in the draft? You say, that A+P doesn't require a NAT44 to be used.
Exactly. That's why I think it would be great if this was stated in the
draft as well. Currently, NAT is obligatory in the draft.
Thanks,
Nejc
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
