Dear Gang, >> What if in my deployment scenario there are no "legacy" end hosts? What >> if all hosts implement A+P-style port ranges? >> >> I'm with Nejc here. A+P/4rd/... do not require NAT44. > > And then, how many hosts could support "what if" in the wild
I don't see why this is important. Anyway, the answer is "hopefully more and more". Isn't encouraging the transition to IPv6 one of the major "commandments" of IETF? Nejc _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
