Dear Wojciech, > It's useful to note that the implementation of any A+P based scheme on > an end host has practical challenges, irrespective of what drafts say > (just think of two such host on the same LAN - something that is not > allowed)
Are these challenges documented anywhere? Also, why would having two such hosts on the same LAN not be allowed? I mean, yes, if you have 2 hosts having the same IPv4 address configured on the interface, that won't work. But in "my world", A+P-enabled hosts are connected to the IPv6 network directly. > If it helps think of any of 4rd, 4V6, dIVI-PD, as having the same > applicability, but practically being most suitable for a CE alongside > NAPT44 (which all rely on to provide address sharing) I agree that this will be the most common scenario. But that doesn't mean we should forget about other scenarios. Thanks, Nejc _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
