>> I am a network/system administrator for my company, which has a very > limited >> set of public IPv4 addresses. But as I don't want to maintain a > separate >> IPv4 >> addressing infrastructure in my network, my server network will be > IPv6-only >> as well. However, the servers still need IPv4 connectivity, and for that > I'd >> like to use A+P. This way: >> >> - I don't need any special ALGs for my servers, which I would have to >> develop >> first since I am using my own proprietary protocols, which can't > traverse >> NATs >> well, >> >> - I don't need to maintain IPv4 in my network where I don't want to > have it, >> especially I don't need to maintain _another_ IPv4 addressing (RFC > 1918), >> >> - I get rid of stateful NAT44 in the core, which is very difficult to make >> highly available properly (state synchronization). >> >> - ... >> >> ---- >> >> Can you see the benefits now? > > The consumption is to produce a brand-new network. If that is the > case, I may prefer going to native IPv6 network.
+1 Behcet _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
