2011/8/19 Rémi Després <[email protected]>: > I think so. > I know that some, although expressing nothing against the idea, would prefer > to wait and see.
I haven't heard so. > But others believe that, concerning the best way to structure drafts, the > earlier is the better. > IMHO, document structure is a last discussion item of standardization. > >> Since collided two documents for same specification would make much >> confusion for people, > > It isn't difficult, in my understanding, to replace sec. 5 of the > Encapsulation draft by a pointer to the stateless-address-mapping draft. > The problem is, there's no consensus before you post the draft. Why do you think they do so? > As you know, I personally believe that the Encapsulation method of a > sufficient tunneling method for stateless operation. (It is more transparent > than the double-translation tunneling method, and adds header overheads that > are small enough in practice). > Yet, I understand that (at least for the time being) there is no consensus on > that. > Both proposals will therefore be discussed. We can discuss well with current drafts, no need alternatives. Without collaboration, it must be a troublemaker. > > Whether Encapsulation and Double-translation methods will remain in separate > drafts or might be regrouped in a single one including their comparison is, > as far as I am concerned, an open question (neither in favor nor against). > > >> I recommend you to collaborate with your friend. > > No need to recommend it! > I have always worked on subjects I find important with whoever is welcoming > my cooperation ;-). > Why don't you introduce them to us? > To conclude, I do hope you will appreciate the 4rd Address-Mapping draft as > much as its authors do, and that it will be a good basis for our further > collaboration. I don't appreciate. I continue to recommend you to collaborate with current 4rd draft authors. cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
