Le 20 août 2011 à 11:46, Mark Townsley a écrit : > On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
>> Le 20 août 2011 à 03:55, Mark Townsley a écrit : ... >>> we're already confused: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-softwire-cgn-bypass-03 >> >> Could you explain more which confusion you are referring to? > > Nejc suggested that DS-Lite without NATs (which I assumed meant without a CGN > NAT, aka AFTR) would be confusing at this stage. > > The title of the referenced document is "Procedure to bypass DS-Lite AFTR" Indeed, but so what? (I don't see which confusion would result from using "4rd address mapping" to designate the stateless mapping called that way so far.) RD
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
