On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:04 PM, Nejc Škoberne wrote: >> Because of what RFC6333 says, suggesting NOW that solutions that don't need >> NATs are variants of DS-lite is a sure way to confuse people.
Then we're already confused: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-softwire-cgn-bypass-03 - Mark > > +1 > > Nejc > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
