On 2011/08/19, at 5:14, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 8/18/11 3:59 PM, GangChen wrote: >> A+P is the same case if I understand correctly. NAT44 is one of three >> fundamental functions in A+P architecture. Otherwise, it can’t connect >> to legacy end-hosts. > > Usually yes, but not necessary. PAT could also do the work, if you connect > behind CPE a host with public IP address, sort of like "bridged mode", and > PAT in CPE changes ports to ones inside port-range/set. > > This way no address translation is needed, just ports needs to be > "redirected" to right ones.
It seems to me that no modification for any system call, correct? AFAIK, Nejc insists some system call modification, bind(), etc., cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
