Sure. The question is really whether its "market share" would be
enough to justify the effort.

But how can you know what the "market share" is? I mean, it's a trade-off between having a smaller sharing ratio and having better
end-to-end (perhaps), direct CPE-CPE communication ... I say let's
give ISPs more solutions to avail, so they can adopt the solution
that suits their needs.

If an average IPv4 user is consuming 200 ports (or whatever
value you prefer to assume) with their favourite p2p app, that
is what sets the number of IPv4 users per shared address. It's
the number of simultaneous ports, not the amount of traffic,
that counts.

There was a thread on this list recently, which discussed a research
on port reusage by applications:

|>  For example, BitTorrent established five hundreds of sessions while
|> the port consumption  was under a hundred in the first minute of the
|> communication, because when BitTorrent initiates a downloading, it
|> first uses the same source port to connect to the different
|> destinations (destination IP and port) therefore one source port
|> multiplexing different sessions. Skype is  another example that uses
|> one source port to  multiplex different sessions thereby
|saving source
|> port consumptions on NAT.

So I guess we have some reserves here as well.

Nejc
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to