Le 2012-02-07 à 16:05, Cameron Byrne a écrit : > Are the map and 4rd solutions deployable for existing networks that do not > have reserves of ipv4 ? My assumption is that these solutions target > existing networks that have meaningful growth and they need a v6 solution. >
NAT64 does needs some IPv4 space to work. MAP/4rd is in the same position, with static sharing instead of dynamic. > If yes, how? Any pointers within the reams of drafts I should look for? > IMHO, the easiest entry in the stateless work of Softwire is the unified draft (tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-softwire-4rd-u-03). > In my brief and simple skimming, it appears to me that setting up one of > these solutions would require me to collapse my existing network to harvest > back the addresses so that they may be redeployed in map. > > What would the deployment process be for an address exhausted network of 10 > million subs with 10% annual growth be? > This has to be looked at compared with NAT64 requirements, with the understanding that a mobile device that supports IPv6 would have most of its traffic in IPv6, and therefore needs only a few IPv4 ports. (If troubled by not enough IPv4 ports, its ASPs should better become IPv6-enabled.) RD > > Cb > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
