Indeed. Such a scenario makes little sense to me, given that MAP requires native IPv6 connectivity anyway.
IOW, if CE is able to get native IPv6 anyway for MAP, then anything non-native IPv6 would have no usage. Cheers, Rajiv Sent from my Phone On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:36 PM, "Lee, Yiu" <[email protected]> wrote: > May I ask a question. Why will people deploy MAP over another tunnel > schema such as 6rd? > > On 2/7/12 1:27 PM, "Tina TSOU" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now if they have to deploy MAP over this for 4over6 traversal, is MAP >> always independent of whether 6to4 was used or 6rd used.....because the >> prefix delegation is different in each. >> > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
