Le 2012-02-08 à 03:36, Lee, Yiu a écrit : > May I ask a question. Why will people deploy MAP over another tunnel > schema such as 6rd?
6rd can be deployed over Net-10 networks (RFC1918) to deployIPv6. Shared public IPv4 addresses can then be offered to customers via this IPv6. Such a use case, based on the header-mappiong variant of 4rd-U rather than on a double MAP encapsulation, is described in tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-softwire-4rd-u-03#section-5.4. RD > > On 2/7/12 1:27 PM, "Tina TSOU" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now if they have to deploy MAP over this for 4over6 traversal, is MAP >> always independent of whether 6to4 was used or 6rd used.....because the >> prefix delegation is different in each. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
