Hi Cameron, 4rd solution IMHO is more suitable for a fixed network. CPE in 4rd is not appropriate to be hosted in a UE.
I think your solution 464XLAT's mobile part is way better for your purposes. There you can put all your IPv4 resources on the PLAT box so that CLAT box is kept simpler. In 4rd, CPEs have A+P and BR is kept "stateless" these are not so useful for your purposes, I think. Regards, Behcet On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Cameron Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > Are the map and 4rd solutions deployable for existing networks that do not > have reserves of ipv4 ? My assumption is that these solutions target > existing networks that have meaningful growth and they need a v6 solution. > > If yes, how? Any pointers within the reams of drafts I should look for? > > In my brief and simple skimming, it appears to me that setting up one of > these solutions would require me to collapse my existing network to harvest > back the addresses so that they may be redeployed in map. > > What would the deployment process be for an address exhausted network of 10 > million subs with 10% annual growth be? > > Cb > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
