Please see below. Cheers, Med
> -----Message d'origine----- > De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mercredi 14 mars 2012 16:13 > À : Alain Durand > Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; Softwires WG; > draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite; > [email protected] > Objet : Re: [Softwires] draft-penno-softwire-sdnat vs. > draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite > > > => the IPv6-Transport DHCP Relay Agent (TRA, vs, the CRA, > IPv6-Transport > Client Relay Agent) > > > o PCP[I-D.ietf-pcp-base]: an initiator can launch multiple PCP > > requests simultaneously to acquire a number ports within the > > same IPv4 address, > > => I can't see how this has a real chance to work... Med: The PCP case has been demoed. Please refer to http://www.internetsociety.org/articles/new-technology-demo-pcp; in particular you can read: "In the second demonstration scenario, the CPE requested several sets of noncontiguous ports (utilizing draft-tsou-pcp-natcoord-03 and draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat-02). Upon receipt of the corresponding PCP request sent by the client, the PCP server requested the CGN to assign port forwarding and to bypass NAT on the requested port ranges. The NAT function was performed on the CPE from this point forward, thus reducing the NAT processing requirement on the CGN router." _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
