On 4/4/12 3:22 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
I have been advised privately by a couple of people that I erred in my
description of relative support for MAP vs. 4rd-U at the meeting.
Support for MAP was predominant, but not to the point of rough consensus.
I was startled at the meeting by how much support 4rd-U got, given that
Remi is the only one who defends it on the list. I guess that affected
my judgement of the numbers -- it just looked like a room-full of hands,
comparable to the showing for MAP.
I'm with you - but what I was missing was the question "how many of you
read all 3 drafts and understands them", followed by "those of you, who
raised your hand, which one do you support".
In this way we would probably easily find the way out.
Room full of hands was political voting, I'm afraid.
My question is, can we do it here, over mailinglist? :)
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
