hi Tom, a neutral point: as a person who were not in the venue (but only through listening and jabber), i also heard it seemed some, never joining either mail list or venue discussion, held up their hands. i doubt they care the techniques itself.
it is a question mark if the comparable number shows there is no rough consensus. but logically i do agree with Ralph, that it was hard to conclude the rough consensus through the numbers. voting is surely never an unbiased estimation method for the consensus. ;-) regards, maoke 2012/4/4 Tom Taylor <[email protected]> > I have been advised privately by a couple of people that I erred in my > description of relative support for MAP vs. 4rd-U at the meeting. Support > for MAP was predominant, but not to the point of rough consensus. > > I was startled at the meeting by how much support 4rd-U got, given that > Remi is the only one who defends it on the list. I guess that affected my > judgement of the numbers -- it just looked like a room-full of hands, > comparable to the showing for MAP. > > Sorry for the misdirection. > > Tom Taylor > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
