Le 2012-04-04 à 03:22, Tom Taylor a écrit : > I have been advised privately by a couple of people that I erred in my > description of relative support for MAP vs. 4rd-U at the meeting. Support for > MAP was predominant, but not to the point of rough consensus.
Right. That's a fact. > I was startled at the meeting by how much support 4rd-U got, given that Remi > is the only one who defends it on the list. Actually not the only one. > I guess that affected my judgement of the numbers -- it just looked like a > room-full of hands, comparable to the showing for MAP. There was indeed support from all sides of the room. That's a fact. All documents as experimental was the plan if no consensus on a single design. Changing the plan because some are disappointed of having the WG didn't go their way wouldn't be justified. Regards, RD > > Sorry for the misdirection. > > Tom Taylor > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
