2012/4/4 Jan Zorz @ go6.si <[email protected]> > On 4/4/12 3:22 AM, Tom Taylor wrote: > >> I have been advised privately by a couple of people that I erred in my >> description of relative support for MAP vs. 4rd-U at the meeting. >> Support for MAP was predominant, but not to the point of rough consensus. >> >> I was startled at the meeting by how much support 4rd-U got, given that >> Remi is the only one who defends it on the list. I guess that affected >> my judgement of the numbers -- it just looked like a room-full of hands, >> comparable to the showing for MAP. >> > > I'm with you - but what I was missing was the question "how many of you > read all 3 drafts and understands them", followed by "those of you, who > raised your hand, which one do you support". > > In this way we would probably easily find the way out. > > Room full of hands was political voting, I'm afraid. > > My question is, can we do it here, over mailinglist? :) >
+0.5. i heard the chair said at the close of the meeting that the mailing list vote would be done within one week. but again, it is a voting, a political method, as i mentioned, not an unbiased estimation for the rough consensus. logically it is strange to me that a group of people playing the vote but without the game rule for the vote. vote is a way of reaching a certain result. if we don't like to make endless voting circles, let's follow the rule of voting: majority wins. cheers, maoke > > Cheers, Jan > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
