Dear Dapeng, Please see inline.
Cheers; Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org >[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de liu dapeng >Envoyé : mardi 5 juin 2012 10:49 >À : Yong Cui >Cc : softwires@ietf.org >Objet : Re: [Softwires] WG last call on >draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-01 > >Hello all, > >I am not sure this version resolves my concerns regarding the possible >misleading by the word "stateless". To avoid this misleading, I >suggest the following changes: > >1. Change the title to "Motivations for Carrier-side Stateless IPv4 >over IPv6 Migration Solutions". Since this document is mainly about >carrier-side stateless, the new title is more precise to reflect the >content of this document. Med: Done. I updated my local copy with the proposed title. > >2. Add a subsection in introduction, clarify that this document is >only about carrier side stateless. Med: We have already this text in the introduction: Current standardization effort that is meant to address this IPv4 service continuity issue focuses mainly on stateful mechanisms that assume the sharing of any global IPv4 address that is left between several customers, based upon the deployment of NAT (Network Address Translation) capabilities in the network. Because of some caveats of such stateful approaches the Service Provider community feels that a companion effort is required to specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6 approaches. This document provides elaboration on such need. Isn't this text sufficient enough? If not, it would helpful to propose a sentence you want to be added to the introduction. > >I would like to support it if the document was updated accordingly. > Thanks. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
