2012/6/7, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>: > Dear Dapeng, > > Please see inline. > > Cheers; > Med > >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org >>[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de liu dapeng >>Envoyé : mardi 5 juin 2012 10:49 >>À : Yong Cui >>Cc : softwires@ietf.org >>Objet : Re: [Softwires] WG last call on >>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-01 >> >>Hello all, >> >>I am not sure this version resolves my concerns regarding the possible >>misleading by the word "stateless". To avoid this misleading, I >>suggest the following changes: >> >>1. Change the title to "Motivations for Carrier-side Stateless IPv4 >>over IPv6 Migration Solutions". Since this document is mainly about >>carrier-side stateless, the new title is more precise to reflect the >>content of this document. > > Med: Done. I updated my local copy with the proposed title.
==> Thanks >> >>2. Add a subsection in introduction, clarify that this document is >>only about carrier side stateless. > > Med: We have already this text in the introduction: > > Current standardization effort that is meant to address this IPv4 > service continuity issue focuses mainly on stateful mechanisms that > assume the sharing of any global IPv4 address that is left between > several customers, based upon the deployment of NAT (Network Address > Translation) capabilities in the network. Because of some caveats of > such stateful approaches the Service Provider community feels that a > companion effort is required to specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6 > approaches. This document provides elaboration on such need. > > Isn't this text sufficient enough? If not, it would helpful to propose a > sentence you want to be added to the introduction. How about adding the following sentences: ------- In many networks today, NAT44 functions is equipped on customer-edge device. It may impact IPv4 over IPv6 solution to be a stateful solution from end-to-end perspectives. The stateless solution also may subject to NAT44 state. In this document, we mainly refer this stateless paradigm to large-scale address Sharing, i.e. carrier-side stateless IPv4 over IPv6, which resolve the concern of “stateless” terminology. This document provides elaboration on such need. ------- Thanks, Best regards, Dapeng Liu >> >>I would like to support it if the document was updated accordingly. >> > > Thanks. > -- ------ Best Regards, Dapeng Liu _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
