On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Jacni Qin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Behcet, all, > > > On Friday, June 22, 2012 2:23:34 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> We have published revised version of our draft on multicast extensions >> to DS-Lite at >> >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-softwire-dslitemulticast-01.txt >> > > It's been discussed on the list and in the 81st meeting, and concluded quite > clearly by the WG why this is abandoned. > It tunnels the IGMP packets upwards, replicates the multicast traffic "per > tunnel", opposite to the property of multicast technology. And these are > problems we're trying to solve. >
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 has nothing to do with DS-Lite and therefore it is not a DS-Lite multicast extensions document as the charter requires. OTOH, draft-sarikaya-softwire-dslitemulticast-01.txt integrates multicast into DS-Lite tunnel. It is not against multicast technology. > There is no necessity to initiate that kind of discussion once again. > I did not start this discussion. Please check the list. Regards. Behcet > > Cheers, > Jacni > > >> We think that this draft should be part of >> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast. >> >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
