FWIW, here is my take on this.
On 6/27/2012 8:30 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: [...]
That's a big IF. Not everybody has to do it the same way. The solution in draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 builds itself something without considering what DS-Lite is doing. As I told you before, DS-Lite unicast is a tunneling technology. If you don't like it it is not DS-Lite multicast to fix this. How many times this should be reminded to you?
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 is a generic solution, nothing specific to DS-Lite, and I've been saying that the draft should be updated to reflect that. However, even though it is generic, I think it is a good solution for use in DS-Lite deployments (in addition to many other deployments). Whether additional solutions are needed for DS-Lite is something the WG should consider. Maybe it already has, I haven't paid enough attention. Stig _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
