On 13/07/2012 1:44 AM, Stig Venaas wrote:
On 12.07.2012 20:21, Jacni Qin wrote:
On 7/10/2012 Tuesday 4:46 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Well, from the so many mails below it is clear that
No, it's clearly clarified from the mails, about the motive, and the
problems to be solved.
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 is anything but multicast
extensions document for DS-Lite.
And it's clear that the "extensions" are definitely NOT to simply use
the unicast tunnel for multicast delivery
in DS-Lite deployment.
FWIW, I think the document is a good solution for multicast in a DS-Lite
environment. I just would like some modifications to the document to
reflect that it is a more generic solution.
Stig
..
I heartily agree with Stig. I think the WG has the choice either to
generalize this document or accept draft-tsou-softwire-6rd-multicast-01
as a parallel solution for the 6rd environment. A single more general
document makes more sense.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
