We have two choices on this one:
a) prohibit the use of an end user IPv6 prefix of length greater than 64
bits;
b) simply remove the reference to RFC6052, or qualify it by saying that
the IID conforms to Section 2.2 of RFC 6052 except in the case of end
user IPv6 prefixes of length greater than 64 bits.
Any preferences?
On 24/01/2013 7:22 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
Tom,
I believe that makes the IID non-conformant to RFC 6052.
it uses an IID similar to 6052... any better suggestion?
(my personal view is that 6052 got things wrong with the U octet, but that's
another matter)
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
