That should be OK.
On 25/01/2013 1:36 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
Tom,
We have two choices on this one:
a) prohibit the use of an end user IPv6 prefix of length greater than 64 bits;
b) simply remove the reference to RFC6052, or qualify it by saying that the IID
conforms to Section 2.2 of RFC 6052 except in the case of end user IPv6
prefixes of length greater than 64 bits.
Any preferences?
RFC6052 permits prefix lengths longer than /64. which isn't at odds with the
current text.
MAP of course permits any prefix length, while 6052 is limited to only 6 sets.
the current text do state that the format is "based on", rfc6052, it does not
say it uses the format from rfc6052.
nor is 6052 a normative reference. what if we change s/based on/similar to/ ?
is that clearer?
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
