Tom, > We have two choices on this one: > > a) prohibit the use of an end user IPv6 prefix of length greater than 64 bits; > > b) simply remove the reference to RFC6052, or qualify it by saying that the > IID conforms to Section 2.2 of RFC 6052 except in the case of end user IPv6 > prefixes of length greater than 64 bits. > > Any preferences?
RFC6052 permits prefix lengths longer than /64. which isn't at odds with the current text. MAP of course permits any prefix length, while 6052 is limited to only 6 sets. the current text do state that the format is "based on", rfc6052, it does not say it uses the format from rfc6052. nor is 6052 a normative reference. what if we change s/based on/similar to/ ? is that clearer? cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
