Could we make this explicit the prefix lengths can be of any arbitrary length? Or bit boundaries? Or nibble boundaries?
Thanks On 1/25/13 1:36 PM, "Ole Troan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Tom, > >> We have two choices on this one: >> >> a) prohibit the use of an end user IPv6 prefix of length greater than >>64 bits; >> >> b) simply remove the reference to RFC6052, or qualify it by saying that >>the IID conforms to Section 2.2 of RFC 6052 except in the case of end >>user IPv6 prefixes of length greater than 64 bits. >> >> Any preferences? > >RFC6052 permits prefix lengths longer than /64. which isn't at odds with >the current text. >MAP of course permits any prefix length, while 6052 is limited to only 6 >sets. > >the current text do state that the format is "based on", rfc6052, it does >not say it uses the format from rfc6052. >nor is 6052 a normative reference. what if we change s/based on/similar >to/ ? is that clearer? > >cheers, >Ole >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
