Vincenzo, 
This is a discussion for the wikipedia 'talk' page. My sense is that 
information must be verifiable, and that the popularity rating at db-engines is 
not transparent. Would you like to start the discussion? Cheers -- Rick

On August 30, 2017 5:17:25 PM MDT, Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>googling for "what is Solr" I found this as *first* sentence:
>
>"Solr is the second-most popular enterprise search engine after
>Elasticsearch. ... "
>
>The description comes from wikipedia https://en.
>wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Solr
>
>Now, well, I'm a little upset, because I think this is a misleading
>description, this answer does not really... well, answer the question.
>
>And even... because Solr is not the first most popular :)))
>
>Ok, seriously, the first sentence (or the answer at all) should not
>define
>the position of the search engine in a list, in a kind of competition
>where
>Solr has the second place.
>If it is the first, the second or whatever most popular is not the
>right
>answer.
>
>So I want inform the community and search for an advice, if any, how to
>have a better description in the Google results page.
>
>If you have any comments or questions, please let me know.
>
>Best regards,
>Vincenzo
>
>
>-- 
>Vincenzo D'Amore
>email: v.dam...@gmail.com
>skype: free.dev
>mobile: +39 349 8513251 <349%20851%203251>

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com 

Reply via email to