Well, isn't it always the same with Wikipedia? It's already there .. so it has to be correct. If you're trying to remove it, you have to prove it - but there is not even prove it should be there in the first place oO
You really need to have time to go through that kind of argument ... -Stefan On Aug 31, 2017 4:37 PM, "Vincenzo D'Amore" <v.dam...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Rick, right, I've already tried to correct the wikipedia page, to be honest, I've just removed the sentence "Solr is the second-most... etc." But my change has been discarded because I missed to add a valid motivation. Anyway, not sure I'm the most representative person to discuss this in the wikipedia talk page :) but I'll try to do whatever I can And just to share with you my thought, my principal motivation is that even if DB Engines has a proven accuracy, the sentence in question has not be considered so relevant to explain what is Solr. For sure, it should be used as first one. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote: > Vincenzo, > This is a discussion for the wikipedia 'talk' page. My sense is that > information must be verifiable, and that the popularity rating at > db-engines is not transparent. Would you like to start the discussion? > Cheers -- Rick > > On August 30, 2017 5:17:25 PM MDT, Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >googling for "what is Solr" I found this as *first* sentence: > > > >"Solr is the second-most popular enterprise search engine after > >Elasticsearch. ... " > > > >The description comes from wikipedia https://en. > >wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Solr > > > >Now, well, I'm a little upset, because I think this is a misleading > >description, this answer does not really... well, answer the question. > > > >And even... because Solr is not the first most popular :))) > > > >Ok, seriously, the first sentence (or the answer at all) should not > >define > >the position of the search engine in a list, in a kind of competition > >where > >Solr has the second place. > >If it is the first, the second or whatever most popular is not the > >right > >answer. > > > >So I want inform the community and search for an advice, if any, how to > >have a better description in the Google results page. > > > >If you have any comments or questions, please let me know. > > > >Best regards, > >Vincenzo > > > > > >-- > >Vincenzo D'Amore > >email: v.dam...@gmail.com > >skype: free.dev > >mobile: +39 349 8513251 <349%20851%203251> > > -- > Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com -- Vincenzo D'Amore email: v.dam...@gmail.com skype: free.dev mobile: +39 349 8513251 <349%20851%203251>
