Wikipedia seems to be better now.  Thank you, Peaceray.   

Honestly, though, by the numbers, I think the comment was correct.   
Elasticsearch has a much smoother on-ramp for IT developers, but it is much 
harder to customize relevancy and integrate with BigData pipelines.   IT 
developers are the big voters here.

Now, Google will simply index this thread, and then show different rich 
snippets to all of us here...

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincenzo D'Amore [mailto:v.dam...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: "What is Solr" in Google search results

Hi Rick,

right, I've already tried to correct the wikipedia page, to be honest, I've 
just removed the sentence "Solr is the second-most... etc."
But my change has been discarded because I missed to add a valid motivation.

Anyway, not sure I'm the most representative person to discuss this in the 
wikipedia talk page :) but I'll try to do whatever I can

And just to share with you my thought, my principal motivation is that even if 
DB Engines has a proven accuracy, the sentence in question has not be 
considered so relevant to explain what is Solr. For sure, it should be used as 
first one.


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:

> Vincenzo,
> This is a discussion for the wikipedia 'talk' page. My sense is that 
> information must be verifiable, and that the popularity rating at 
> db-engines is not transparent. Would you like to start the discussion?
> Cheers -- Rick
>
> On August 30, 2017 5:17:25 PM MDT, Vincenzo D'Amore 
> <v.dam...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >googling for "what is Solr" I found this as *first* sentence:
> >
> >"Solr is the second-most popular enterprise search engine after 
> >Elasticsearch. ... "
> >
> >The description comes from wikipedia https://en.
> >wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Solr
> >
> >Now, well, I'm a little upset, because I think this is a misleading 
> >description, this answer does not really... well, answer the question.
> >
> >And even... because Solr is not the first most popular :)))
> >
> >Ok, seriously, the first sentence (or the answer at all) should not 
> >define the position of the search engine in a list, in a kind of 
> >competition where Solr has the second place.
> >If it is the first, the second or whatever most popular is not the 
> >right answer.
> >
> >So I want inform the community and search for an advice, if any, how 
> >to have a better description in the Google results page.
> >
> >If you have any comments or questions, please let me know.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Vincenzo
> >
> >
> >--
> >Vincenzo D'Amore
> >email: v.dam...@gmail.com
> >skype: free.dev
> >mobile: +39 349 8513251 <349%20851%203251>
>
> --
> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com




--
Vincenzo D'Amore
email: v.dam...@gmail.com
skype: free.dev
mobile: +39 349 8513251 <349%20851%203251>

Reply via email to