my documents are user entries, so i'm guessing they vary a lot. Tomorrow i'll try 3.1 and also 4.0, and see if they have an improvement. thanks guys!
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> wrote: > > Thanks > > but i've disabled the cache already, since my concern is speed and i'm > > willing to pay the price (memory) > > Then you should not disable the cache. > > >, and my subset are not fixed. > > Does the facet search do any extra work that i don't need, that i might > be > > able to disable (either by a flag or by a code change), > > Somehow i feel, or rather hope, that counting the terms of 200K documents > > and finding the top 500 should take less than 30 seconds. > > Using facet.enum.cache.minDf should be a little faster than just > disabling the cache - it's a different code path. > Using the cache selectively will speed things up, so try setting that > minDf to 1000 or so for example. > > How many unique terms do you have in the index? > Is this Solr 3.1 - there were some optimizations when there were many > terms to iterate over? > You could also try trunk, which has even more optimizations, or the > bulkpostings branch if you really want to experiment. > > -Yonik >
