Thanks Sami, so long at it's expected ;)

In regards to the replication not working the way I think it should,
am I missing something or is it simply not working the way I think?

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> and having looked at this closer, shouldn't the down node not be
>> marked as active when I stop that solr instance?
>
> Currently the shard state is not updated in the cloudstate when a node
> goes down. This behavior should probably be changed at some point.
>
> --
>  Sami Siren

Reply via email to