No problem. But what is the proper procedure to request a review? Just  
send an email to sourcejuicer?

Bruce

On Apr 6, 2009, at 10:59 AM, Christian Kelly wrote:

> Bruce Rothermal wrote:
>> I'm trying to learn how to submit a spec file "modules". I've  
>> gotten one review after submitting a spec file I found for modules.  
>> I've made several changes based on examples, but have not gotten  
>> any more reviews. I've sent requests to sourcejuicer alias but no  
>> responses. The web site says that review will be done but leaves it  
>> as a mysterious process that just happens.
>>
>> Any idea what official process should be done to get a review or  
>> some feedback on submissions?
>>
>> Thanks for any help
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>
> Bruce,
>
> sorry, we're not paying close enough attention. I've validated you  
> config and made one comment on it. It should now build.
>
> _Christian
>
>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Dermot McCluskey wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/06/09 16:19, Bruce Rothermal wrote:
>>>> What is the jucr-auth server issue?
>>>
>>> Users were unable to log in.  Seems to be fixed now.
>>> (Alen had a look at it.)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Does it have anything to do with submissions just sitting?
>>>
>>> No - can you describe what you're seeing ?
>>>
>>>
>>> - Dermot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Andras Barna wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> btw: somebody knows what's up with the jucr-auth server issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jan Hnatek <Jan.Hnatek at sun.com>  
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi sourcejuicer team,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would be beneficial if you provided the description of
>>>>>> the sourcejuicer build environment, so that potential spec  
>>>>>> submitters
>>>>>> can get their spec files to the best possible shape before  
>>>>>> going through
>>>>>> the submission/approval/jucr build procedure.
>>>>>> Did I miss this information (should be ideally on the jucr web),
>>>>>> or it's just not there (yet)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> hnhn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Jan Hnatek
>>>>>> jan.hnatek at sun.com
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Andy
>>>>> http://blog.sartek.net
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>


Reply via email to