you tried it on your machine?!
a) Source:
ftp://modules.sourceforge.net/pub/modules/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
ftp? i dont think that sourceforge has ftp

b) check this page: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/help/spec_file
you miss some things, like:

# OpenSolaris IPS Manifest Fields
Meta(info.upstream): ____________________
Meta(info.repository_url): ______________
Meta(info.maintainer): ___name____ <__email__>


On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> 
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> My submission is failing in the build and is saying to use the --download
> option. I don't see anything in the examples or instructions showing how to
> use --download. Anyone know how or can give an example.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bruce
>
> *INFO: Checking dependencies of modules
> INFO: Finding sources
> INFO: copying sources to /packages/SOURCES
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.24
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.22
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.20
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/moz-evo
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /jds/packages/SOURCES
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in
> /specs/staging/manpages/sun-manpage-tarballs
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in
> /specs/staging/po-sun/po-sun-tarballs
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /packages/SOURCES
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/ext-sources
> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/copyright
> INFO: Hint: you need to use the --download option to enable automatic
> downloads
> ERROR: modules: Source file modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found
> *
>
>
>
> Christian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> Bruce Rothermal wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to learn how to submit a spec file "modules". I've gotten one
>>> review after submitting a spec file I found for modules. I've made several
>>> changes based on examples, but have not gotten any more reviews. I've sent
>>> requests to sourcejuicer alias but no responses. The web site says that
>>> review will be done but leaves it as a mysterious process that just happens.
>>>
>>> Any idea what official process should be done to get a review or some
>>> feedback on submissions?
>>>
>>> Thanks for any help
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> sorry, we're not paying close enough attention. I've validated you config
>> and made one comment on it. It should now build.
>>
>> _Christian
>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Dermot McCluskey wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/06/09 16:19, Bruce Rothermal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the jucr-auth server issue?
>>>>
>>>> Users were unable to log in. ?Seems to be fixed now.
>>>> (Alen had a look at it.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Does it have anything to do with submissions just sitting?
>>>>
>>>> No - can you describe what you're seeing ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Dermot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Andras Barna wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> btw: somebody knows what's up with the jucr-auth server issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jan Hnatek <Jan.Hnatek at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi sourcejuicer team,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it would be beneficial if you provided the description of
>>>>>>> the sourcejuicer build environment, so that potential spec submitters
>>>>>>> can get their spec files to the best possible shape before going
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>> the submission/approval/jucr build procedure.
>>>>>>> Did I miss this information (should be ideally on the jucr web),
>>>>>>> or it's just not there (yet)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> hnhn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jan Hnatek
>>>>>>> jan.hnatek at sun.com
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>> http://blog.sartek.net
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>



-- 
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net

Reply via email to