Hi All My submission is failing in the build and is saying to use the --download option. I don't see anything in the examples or instructions showing how to use --download. Anyone know how or can give an example.
Thanks Bruce *INFO: Checking dependencies of modules INFO: Finding sources INFO: copying sources to /packages/SOURCES INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.24 INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.22 INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.20 INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/moz-evo INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /jds/packages/SOURCES INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/manpages/sun-manpage-tarballs INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/po-sun/po-sun-tarballs INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /packages/SOURCES INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/ext-sources INFO: modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/copyright INFO: Hint: you need to use the --download option to enable automatic downloads ERROR: modules: Source file modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found * Christian Kelly wrote: > Bruce Rothermal wrote: >> I'm trying to learn how to submit a spec file "modules". I've gotten >> one review after submitting a spec file I found for modules. I've >> made several changes based on examples, but have not gotten any more >> reviews. I've sent requests to sourcejuicer alias but no responses. >> The web site says that review will be done but leaves it as a >> mysterious process that just happens. >> >> Any idea what official process should be done to get a review or some >> feedback on submissions? >> >> Thanks for any help >> >> Bruce >> > > Bruce, > > sorry, we're not paying close enough attention. I've validated you > config and made one comment on it. It should now build. > > _Christian > >> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Dermot McCluskey wrote: >> >>> On 04/06/09 16:19, Bruce Rothermal wrote: >>>> What is the jucr-auth server issue? >>> >>> Users were unable to log in. Seems to be fixed now. >>> (Alen had a look at it.) >>> >>> >>>> Does it have anything to do with submissions just sitting? >>> >>> No - can you describe what you're seeing ? >>> >>> >>> - Dermot >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Bruce >>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Andras Barna wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> btw: somebody knows what's up with the jucr-auth server issue? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jan Hnatek <Jan.Hnatek at sun.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi sourcejuicer team, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would be beneficial if you provided the description of >>>>>> the sourcejuicer build environment, so that potential spec >>>>>> submitters >>>>>> can get their spec files to the best possible shape before going >>>>>> through >>>>>> the submission/approval/jucr build procedure. >>>>>> Did I miss this information (should be ideally on the jucr web), >>>>>> or it's just not there (yet)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> hnhn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jan Hnatek >>>>>> jan.hnatek at sun.com >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Andy >>>>> http://blog.sartek.net >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >
