On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> wrote: > Hi Andras > > Thanks for the comments. I took the Source from a spec file in the source. I > will correct it. > > Can you define what these are and I will add them. > info.upstream
it seems it's the upstream author > info.repository_url svn/cvs/hg/whatever url > info.maintainer you > > Thanks > > Bruce > > On Apr 6, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Andras Barna wrote: > >> you tried it on your machine?! >> a) Source: >> ftp://modules.sourceforge.net/pub/modules/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz >> ftp? i dont think that sourceforge has ftp >> >> b) check this page: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/help/spec_file >> you miss some things, like: >> >> # OpenSolaris IPS Manifest Fields >> Meta(info.upstream): ____________________ >> Meta(info.repository_url): ______________ >> Meta(info.maintainer): ___name____ <__email__> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All >>> >>> My submission is failing in the build and is saying to use the --download >>> option. I don't see anything in the examples or instructions showing how >>> to >>> use --download. Anyone know how or can give an example. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> *INFO: Checking dependencies of modules >>> INFO: Finding sources >>> INFO: copying sources to /packages/SOURCES >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.24 >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.22 >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/gnome2.20 >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /sgnome/tarballs/moz-evo >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /jds/packages/SOURCES >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in >>> /specs/staging/manpages/sun-manpage-tarballs >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in >>> /specs/staging/po-sun/po-sun-tarballs >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /packages/SOURCES >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/ext-sources >>> INFO: ? ?modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found in /specs/staging/copyright >>> INFO: Hint: you need to use the --download option to enable automatic >>> downloads >>> ERROR: modules: Source file modules-3.2.6.tar.gz not found >>> * >>> >>> >>> >>> Christian Kelly wrote: >>>> >>>> Bruce Rothermal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to learn how to submit a spec file "modules". I've gotten >>>>> one >>>>> review after submitting a spec file I found for modules. I've made >>>>> several >>>>> changes based on examples, but have not gotten any more reviews. I've >>>>> sent >>>>> requests to sourcejuicer alias but no responses. The web site says that >>>>> review will be done but leaves it as a mysterious process that just >>>>> happens. >>>>> >>>>> Any idea what official process should be done to get a review or some >>>>> feedback on submissions? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any help >>>>> >>>>> Bruce >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bruce, >>>> >>>> sorry, we're not paying close enough attention. I've validated you >>>> config >>>> and made one comment on it. It should now build. >>>> >>>> _Christian >>>> >>>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Dermot McCluskey wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 04/06/09 16:19, Bruce Rothermal wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the jucr-auth server issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> Users were unable to log in. ?Seems to be fixed now. >>>>>> (Alen had a look at it.) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Does it have anything to do with submissions just sitting? >>>>>> >>>>>> No - can you describe what you're seeing ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - Dermot >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruce >>>>>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Andras Barna wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> btw: somebody knows what's up with the jucr-auth server issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jan Hnatek <Jan.Hnatek at sun.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi sourcejuicer team, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think it would be beneficial if you provided the description of >>>>>>>>> the sourcejuicer build environment, so that potential spec >>>>>>>>> submitters >>>>>>>>> can get their spec files to the best possible shape before going >>>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>>> the submission/approval/jucr build procedure. >>>>>>>>> Did I miss this information (should be ideally on the jucr web), >>>>>>>>> or it's just not there (yet)? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> hnhn >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Jan Hnatek >>>>>>>>> jan.hnatek at sun.com >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>>> http://blog.sartek.net >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Andy >> http://blog.sartek.net > > -- Andy http://blog.sartek.net
