:) The pkg server setup is broken as Shawn has pointed out. Sorry for any inconvenience this has caused, it will be fixed tomorrow.
Luis Bruce Rothermal wrote: > I get > > brucer at vm-os:~$ pfexec pkg refresh > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 2228, in ? > __ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 2171, in main_func > return catalog_refresh(mydir, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1494, in catalog_refresh > api_inst.refresh(full_refresh, pargs) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/api.py", line > 574, in refresh > auths_to_refresh) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line > 1398, in retrieve_catalogs > self._do_get_catalog(auth, hdr, ts) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line > 1351, in _do_get_catalog > hdr, ts) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", > line 126, in get_catalog > updatelog.recv(c, croot, ts, auth) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/updatelog.py", line 243, > in recv > UpdateLog._recv_updates(c, path, ts, cl_size) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/updatelog.py", line 337, > in _recv_updates > raise UpdateLogException, \ > UpdateLogException: Package V pkg nexuiz 25,5.11-0.101:20090407T150615Z > is already in the catalog > > > pkg: This is an internal error. Please let the developers know about > this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including > the > above traceback and this message. The version of pkg(5) is > '666742d60b75'. > brucer at vm-os:~$ > > > Bruce > > > Luis de Bethencourt wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> I just checked this. Eventhough the package is listed in: >> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/en/catalog.shtml >> and detailed information can be seen at: >> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/manifest/0/modules%403.2.6%2C5.11-0.101%3A20090409T201103Z >> >> >> >> the package cant be found in packagemanager. >> >> I have been trying to examine this error, and it seams that the >> catalog is faulty. >> >> Can you please try and do: >> pfexec pkg refresh >> >> Let me know if python crashes with a UpdateLogException. If this is >> the case, packagemanager is not seeing the complete catalog. >> >> Luis >> >> >> Bruce Rothermal wrote: >>> Is anyone from the source juicer team available on this alias? >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> *From: *Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at Sun.COM >>>> <mailto:Bruce.Rothermal at Sun.COM>> >>>> *Date: *April 13, 2009 10:18:12 AM MDT >>>> *To: *sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> <mailto:sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org>, Christian Kelly >>>> <Christian.Kelly at Sun.COM <mailto:Christian.Kelly at Sun.COM>> >>>> *Subject: **[sourcejuicer-discuss] build not getting into repo* >>>> >>>> When I build my spec file package I'm having a problem of it not >>>> making it into the repo. >>>> >>>> This is the behavior I've noticed. >>>> >>>> I submit the spec file and it passes syntax checking. >>>> I view it in build and it shows that its in the queue waiting to >>>> start with submitter as myself. >>>> When the job completes it now shows that it has built successfully >>>> but the submitter name is Not Available. >>>> >>>> Checked it this morning and now the submitter name is myself. >>>> However I can not download it. Package does not show up in package >>>> manager. I have package manager authority set as >>>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/. >>>> >>>> >>>> Why is my package not showing up in the repo? >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> <mailto:sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org> >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>> >> >
