Bruce, The issue hasn't been resolved. Sorry once again :(
Luis Bruce Rothermal wrote: > Morning all > > I just wanted to check on status. I didn't see any updates on this > issue today on alias and there doesn't seem to be any change in packages. > > Bruce > > > On Apr 13, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > >> :) The pkg server setup is broken as Shawn has pointed out. >> >> Sorry for any inconvenience this has caused, it will be fixed tomorrow. >> >> Luis >> >> Bruce Rothermal wrote: >>> I get >>> >>> brucer at vm-os:~$ pfexec pkg refresh >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 2228, in ? >>> __ret = main_func() >>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 2171, in main_func >>> return catalog_refresh(mydir, pargs) >>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1494, in catalog_refresh >>> api_inst.refresh(full_refresh, pargs) >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/api.py", line >>> 574, in refresh >>> auths_to_refresh) >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line >>> 1398, in retrieve_catalogs >>> self._do_get_catalog(auth, hdr, ts) >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line >>> 1351, in _do_get_catalog >>> hdr, ts) >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", >>> line 126, in get_catalog >>> updatelog.recv(c, croot, ts, auth) >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/updatelog.py", line >>> 243, in recv >>> UpdateLog._recv_updates(c, path, ts, cl_size) >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/updatelog.py", line >>> 337, in _recv_updates >>> raise UpdateLogException, \ >>> UpdateLogException: Package V pkg nexuiz 25,5.11-0.101:20090407T150615Z >>> is already in the catalog >>> >>> >>> pkg: This is an internal error. Please let the developers know >>> about this >>> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and >>> including the >>> above traceback and this message. The version of pkg(5) is >>> '666742d60b75'. >>> brucer at vm-os:~$ >>> >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>> Luis de Bethencourt wrote: >>>> Bruce, >>>> >>>> I just checked this. Eventhough the package is listed in: >>>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/en/catalog.shtml >>>> and detailed information can be seen at: >>>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/manifest/0/modules%403.2.6%2C5.11-0.101%3A20090409T201103Z >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> the package cant be found in packagemanager. >>>> >>>> I have been trying to examine this error, and it seams that the >>>> catalog is faulty. >>>> >>>> Can you please try and do: >>>> pfexec pkg refresh >>>> >>>> Let me know if python crashes with a UpdateLogException. If this is >>>> the case, packagemanager is not seeing the complete catalog. >>>> >>>> Luis >>>> >>>> >>>> Bruce Rothermal wrote: >>>>> Is anyone from the source juicer team available on this alias? >>>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>>> *From: *Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at Sun.COM >>>>>> <mailto:Bruce.Rothermal at Sun.COM>> >>>>>> *Date: *April 13, 2009 10:18:12 AM MDT >>>>>> *To: *sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>> <mailto:sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org>, Christian Kelly >>>>>> <Christian.Kelly at Sun.COM <mailto:Christian.Kelly at Sun.COM>> >>>>>> *Subject: **[sourcejuicer-discuss] build not getting into repo* >>>>>> >>>>>> When I build my spec file package I'm having a problem of it not >>>>>> making it into the repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the behavior I've noticed. >>>>>> >>>>>> I submit the spec file and it passes syntax checking. >>>>>> I view it in build and it shows that its in the queue waiting to >>>>>> start with submitter as myself. >>>>>> When the job completes it now shows that it has built >>>>>> successfully but the submitter name is Not Available. >>>>>> >>>>>> Checked it this morning and now the submitter name is myself. >>>>>> However I can not download it. Package does not show up in >>>>>> package manager. I have package manager authority set as >>>>>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is my package not showing up in the repo? >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>> <mailto:sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org> >>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
