bruce, KNOWN problem!!!

christian will work on it!!

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Bruce Rothermal
<Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> wrote:
> I get
>
> brucer at vm-os:~$ pfexec pkg refresh
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ?File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 2228, in ?
> ? __ret = main_func()
> ?File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 2171, in main_func
> ? return catalog_refresh(mydir, pargs)
> ?File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1494, in catalog_refresh
> ? api_inst.refresh(full_refresh, pargs)
> ?File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/api.py", line 574, in
> refresh
> ? auths_to_refresh)
> ?File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1398,
> in retrieve_catalogs
> ? self._do_get_catalog(auth, hdr, ts)
> ?File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1351,
> in _do_get_catalog
> ? hdr, ts)
> ?File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 126,
> in get_catalog
> ? updatelog.recv(c, croot, ts, auth)
> ?File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/updatelog.py", line 243, in
> recv
> ? UpdateLog._recv_updates(c, path, ts, cl_size)
> ?File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/updatelog.py", line 337, in
> _recv_updates
> ? raise UpdateLogException, \
> UpdateLogException: Package V pkg nexuiz 25,5.11-0.101:20090407T150615Z
> is already in the catalog
>
>
> pkg: This is an internal error. ?Please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and this message. ?The version of pkg(5) is '666742d60b75'.
> brucer at vm-os:~$
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
> Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> I just checked this. Eventhough the package is listed in:
>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/en/catalog.shtml
>> and detailed information can be seen at:
>>
>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/manifest/0/modules%403.2.6%2C5.11-0.101%3A20090409T201103Z
>>
>> the package cant be found in packagemanager.
>>
>> I have been trying to examine this error, and it seams that the catalog is
>> faulty.
>>
>> Can you please try and do:
>> pfexec pkg refresh
>>
>> Let me know if python crashes with a UpdateLogException. If this is the
>> case, packagemanager is not seeing the complete catalog.
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>
>> Bruce Rothermal wrote:
>>>
>>> Is anyone from the source juicer team available on this alias?
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> *From: *Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at Sun.COM
>>>> <mailto:Bruce.Rothermal at Sun.COM>>
>>>> *Date: *April 13, 2009 10:18:12 AM MDT
>>>> *To: *sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> <mailto:sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org>, Christian Kelly
>>>> <Christian.Kelly at Sun.COM <mailto:Christian.Kelly at Sun.COM>>
>>>> *Subject: **[sourcejuicer-discuss] build not getting into repo*
>>>>
>>>> When I build my spec file package I'm having a problem of it not making
>>>> it into the repo.
>>>>
>>>> This is the behavior I've noticed.
>>>>
>>>> I submit the spec file and it passes syntax checking.
>>>> I view it in build and it shows that its in the queue waiting to start
>>>> with submitter as myself.
>>>> When the job completes it now shows that it has built successfully but
>>>> the submitter name is Not Available.
>>>>
>>>> Checked it this morning and now the submitter name is myself. However I
>>>> can not download it. Package does not show up in package manager. I have
>>>> package manager authority set as http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why is my package not showing up in the repo?
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> <mailto:sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org>
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>



-- 
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net

Reply via email to