>> "I believe that the mission would do best to proceed with a team that
>> is broken up into smaller groups.  This way, the investigation can
>> proceed more quickly and the people doing the investigating can be
>> more subtle about what they're looking for.  Too big a group doing
>> investigating in the same place tends to stand out.  But at the same
>> time, the teams have to be large enough to have backup in case it's
>> needed.  And I believe it is important for everyone to start off
>> on the same footing.  I was considering having the starting point for the
>> teams be that meeting place you had mentioned that the informant
>> invited you to see.  Would that be acceptable?"
>
>"Your approach will need to be worked out with Admiral Kitanya," t'Llhweiir
>replied.  "However, I do not believe having your teams meet the informant would
>be a good idea.  She does not seem to be the type who would appreciate extensive
>contacts with Star Fleet personnel.  In fact, I would rather be that
>contact--at least initially--since she extended the invitation to me."
>
>This seemed to be a change of mind on the admiral's part.  She seemed to
>unsure about Liridian's approach.

Steven shook his head.

"You misunderstand me, Admiral.  What I'm saying is that you meet
with the informant at the location, but the teams going to search for
the missing people and ships will accompany you and use that
location as a starting point, but we will not meet with the informant."

[reaction?]

Liridian out.



"A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof.
And when you have a good proof,it's because it's proven." - Canadian Prime
Minister Jean Chretien on the US policy on Iraq- 06 September 2002
"100% of the shots you DON'T take don't go in." - Wayne Gretzky
Engineer-In-Training - BSEE 2003.  Can Grad School be far behind?


_______________________________________________
Spacedock mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.scifi-rpgs.com/mailman/listinfo/spacedock_scifi-rpgs.com

Reply via email to