>Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:13:10 -0500
>From: Máirín Duffy <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info
>To: [email protected]
>[email protected] wrote:
>> Mairin,
>>> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy
>>> <[email protected]> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> What is in this template? That seems like a good place to
>>>>> investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may
>>>>> lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base.
<snip>
>can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it?
There are a lot of differences - I'd guess they did a full yum update on the
template between when they made the test machine, and what was used on the new
system.
That being said, I have to admit to feeling as though the spacewalk Spacewalk
team, in offering a package for CentOS 5.2, and *not* noting things that were
needed for different versions of that, and yum not automagically determining
the dependencies - I remember the full d/l for spacewalk was something like 267
packages - leaves me at the point of wondering if I need to build from source,
and not trusting a binary release.
mark
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
