----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info
>Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:41 -0700
From: Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:13:10 -0500
From: Máirín Duffy <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info
Mairin,
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy
<[email protected]> [email protected] wrote:
What is in this template? That seems like a good place to
investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may
lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base.
<snip>
can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it?
There are a lot of differences - I'd guess they did a full yum update on
the template between when they made the test machine, and what was used
on the new system.
At this point you are the only source out of many people who have
CentOS-5 boxes. So I would say you are putting the cart before the
horse.. At this point, we know that you are having a problem, and do
not know why. We know that other people who have replied to one of
your threads have not had this problem. So it is a matter to find out
what is the difference between your system and others.
Interesting thought: so, let me ask: anyone with spacewalk running on
CentOS 5.2 (final): what does your uname -a show?
[m...@hubble ~]$ uname -a
Linux hubble.xxxxxxxxxx.com 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43
EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
-Mike
mark
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
