On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:13:10 -0500 >>From: Máirín Duffy <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info >>To: [email protected] >>[email protected] wrote: >>> Mairin, >>>> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy >>>> <[email protected]> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> What is in this template? That seems like a good place to >>>>>> investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may >>>>>> lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base. > <snip> >>can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it? > > There are a lot of differences - I'd guess they did a full yum update on the > template between when they made the test machine, and what was used on the > new system. > > That being said, I have to admit to feeling as though the spacewalk Spacewalk > team, in offering a package for CentOS 5.2, and *not* noting things that were > needed for different versions of that, and yum not automagically determining > the dependencies - I remember the full d/l for spacewalk was something like > 267 packages - leaves me at the point of wondering if I need to build from > source, and not trusting a binary release.
At this point you are the only source out of many people who have CentOS-5 boxes. So I would say you are putting the cart before the horse.. At this point, we know that you are having a problem, and do not know why. We know that other people who have replied to one of your threads have not had this problem. So it is a matter to find out what is the difference between your system and others. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
