>Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:41 -0700
>From: Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]>
>On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:13:10 -0500
>>>From: Máirín Duffy <[email protected]>
>>>Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info
>>>> Mairin,
>>>>> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy
>>>>> <[email protected]> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>> What is in this template? That seems like a good place to
>>>>>>> investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may
>>>>>>> lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base.
>> <snip>
>>>can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it?
>>
>> There are a lot of differences - I'd guess they did a full yum update on the
>> template between when they made the test machine, and what was used on the
>> new system.
>
>At this point you are the only source out of many people who have
>CentOS-5 boxes. So I would say you are putting the cart before the
>horse.. At this point, we know that you are having a problem, and do
>not know why. We know that other people who have replied to one of
>your threads have not had this problem. So it is a matter to find out
>what is the difference between your system and others.
Interesting thought: so, let me ask: anyone with spacewalk running on CentOS
5.2 (final): what does your uname -a show?
mark
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
