Hey, It's just my point of view, but spacewalk is kind of ressource consuming on a server and in my point of view, it should be alone. But I understand some people does put other DB on the same server than spacewalk. Reading at the discussion, I think that the admin should be able to tell if the DB should be controlled or not by the script in /etc/rhn/rhn.conf. I don't think that this idea has been implemented.
OK for oracle control. Anyway, I'll try to find how to get rid of the osa-dispatcher log message. Pierre 2011/11/3 Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:44AM +0100, Pierre Casenove wrote: > > Hi, > > I understand (although I don't share the conclusion: if postgresql is > > running locally, only spacewalk database should exist). > > Why exactly? > > > In that case, why leaving the test if /etc/init.d/oracle is executable in > > the script and the DB_SERVICE variable? > > That is Satellite embedded database thing. Note that the typical > Oracle XE installation uses the oracle-xe service name. > > -- > Jan Pazdziora > Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
