Hello, Are you interested in adding the option to control the database in the configuration file and that I propose a patch or not?
Thanks, Pierre 2011/11/3 Pierre Casenove <[email protected]> > Hey, > It's just my point of view, but spacewalk is kind of ressource consuming > on a server and in my point of view, it should be alone. But I understand > some people does put other DB on the same server than spacewalk. > Reading at the discussion, I think that the admin should be able to tell > if the DB should be controlled or not by the script in /etc/rhn/rhn.conf. I > don't think that this idea has been implemented. > > OK for oracle control. > > Anyway, I'll try to find how to get rid of the osa-dispatcher log message. > > Pierre > > > > 2011/11/3 Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]> > >> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:44AM +0100, Pierre Casenove wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I understand (although I don't share the conclusion: if postgresql is >> > running locally, only spacewalk database should exist). >> >> Why exactly? >> >> > In that case, why leaving the test if /etc/init.d/oracle is executable >> in >> > the script and the DB_SERVICE variable? >> >> That is Satellite embedded database thing. Note that the typical >> Oracle XE installation uses the oracle-xe service name. >> >> -- >> Jan Pazdziora >> Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
