> At 11:10 23-3-2004, you wrote:
>
> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >You seem to be generating a message-id, but it should be "Message-ID",
> not
> >"Message-Id". Note capitalization.
>
> "Should be" is not the correct wording. Header field names are supposed to
> be case insensitive, so Message-Id is just as correct as Message-ID, per
> RFC 822. If there are regular mail clients generating the header as such,
> it should not be the basis for any spam scoring.
Now this looks interesting.. As it says in 20_head_tests.cf,
describe MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT Message-Id was added by a relay
The relay in my case should be my own server.. Look at the differencies,
the first example is from my own server, the second when I send mail from
the same Outlook, but via Yahoo!'s mailer:
Via my own:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.the-server.net ([unix socket])
by iris (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:17 +0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.the-server.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F02E10B7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.the-server.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (iris [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 00478-04-9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from edit (edit.the-server.net [192.168.111.30])
by mail.the-server.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FAE1099
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:02 +0100 (CET)
From: "Anders Norrbring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:07 +0100
Organization: Norrbring Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
thread-index: AcQQwoKtCVChFjvBQJmJ8aPi1IcuzQ==
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New, Kaspersky Lab's AV & NOD32 AV at
the-server.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 tagged_above=3.0 required=7.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT
X-Spam-Level: ****
....................................
Via Yahoo!:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.the-server.net ([unix socket])
by iris (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:36:50 +0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.the-server.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE6F102F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:36:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.the-server.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (iris [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 00107-07-2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:36:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com
[216.136.174.138])
by mail.the-server.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 15D06798
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:36:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from unknown (HELO edit) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with login)
by smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 10:35:32 -0000
From: "Anders Norrbring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:35:35 +0100
Organization: Norrbring Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
thread-index: AcQQwoKtCVChFjvBQJmJ8aPi1IcuzQ==
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New, Kaspersky Lab's AV & NOD32 AV at
the-server.net
Is there a difference? The same outgoing mail, just 2 different SMTP
servers... One gets tagged 4.1, the other none..
Anders.
