Everything M$ does makes some kind of twisted sense. The problem is it's mostly twisted... :)
Gary -----Original Message----- From: Bob George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 8:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Outlook 2003 idiot mail client... :( Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Bob George wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:55:39 -0500: >>But only if NOT using Exchange, right? :) > > Well, but in that case Exchange will add it's own hostname, won't it? So, > the problem remains the same. Or doesn't Exchange add a Received line when > it gets the mail from the client? After re-reading http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2003/up031211.htm where it states: > [...] Mark says that, as he understands it, Microsoft's position that > they expect all mail servers to whitelist outgoing mail from Outlook > 2003 users and add a Message-ID header to fill in the one that > Outlook omits. I think I might see some logic at play, although I'm not sure I agree. I suppose Microsoft's logic is that by removing insertion of that header from the client to the server, the decision of what to add can be controlled centrally. In the anti-spam wars, perhaps this makes a twisted kind of sense, in that "normal" users SHOULD be going through a relay server (ISP or corporate). Still, it's trivial for a spammer to get around this. It would be nice if this were one of their policy settings rather than a blanket default. - Bob
