Alright, I've resisted posting to this just because it's off topic, but having explored it a bit, I'll put in my two cents worth. I've installed both WhiteBox and CentOS on several machines, and the end result is almost identical, which is expected, as they are essentially RHEL 3. I would lean toward CentOS for two main reasons: 1) They are a development community (multiple individuals unlikely to all become deceased at once) as opposed to an individual creating a distro such as with Tao or Whitebox, so might be more long lived, and 2) using yum for upgrades, I have found Whitebox to be very slow, although I freely admit to having not explored mirrors.
Also, I upgraded a RH9 workstation to Centos3 no problem. Just download the Centos yum.conf and do an upgrade. There were maybe three or four dependency issues (development libraries I had to dismiss, but didn't need on a server machine anyway), and I just came back the next morning to my new CentOS enterprise server. No issues.


Ben

Reply via email to